1000-Lb. Ngôi sao của Sisters Amy Slaton đã bị bắt tại sở thú Tennessee vào cuối tuần nghỉ lễ.
Có vẻ như bạn đang mô tả chiến lược của Sở cảnh sát quận Crockett để đối phó với một vị khách bị lạc đà cắn tại một vườn thú địa phương và khi đến nơi, họ ngay lập tức bị choáng ngợp bởi mùi hôi đáng ngờ bốc ra từ xe của vị khách đó.
Dòng này là một cách chơi chữ thông minh dùng để chỉ bài đăng, Slaton và chiếc xe. Đường dây đã bị bắt vì sở hữu Bảng I, Bảng VI và hai tội danh gây nguy hiểm cho trẻ em. Một người đàn ông tên Brian Scott có mặt trong phòng xử án, đã bị bắt với tội danh tương tự như cảnh sát đã nêu.
This statement is commonly used in legal settings to emphasize the presumption of innocence, which is a crucial aspect of the case. The statement suggests that the charges and allegations are merely accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence, and implies that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty through due process of law. This language is often used in legal contexts to highlight the importance of the presumption of innocence, which is a fundamental aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the significance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are referred to as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which is an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is usually employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as a crucial aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently employed in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The presumption of innocence refers to the role as an essential element in a legal proceedings where the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. The presumption of innocence serves as an essential element in the case by, which plays an essential part in the role of:
Chúng tôi đã xác nhận vào thứ Ba, ngày 3 tháng 9, rằng Slaton và Lovvorn vẫn đang bị giam giữ và đang chờ phiên điều trần tại ngoại sau khi bị phát hiện mang theo thứ mà cảnh sát cho là nấm và cần sa mà họ sở hữu. Theo Cán bộ Thông tin Công cộng Stephen Sutton, một nhân viên vườn thú đã gọi 911 để báo cáo rằng Slaton đã bị lạc đà cắn và do bị cho là bị thương nên đã được đưa đến phòng cấp cứu và sau đó bị bắt sau khi cô được chăm sóc y tế.
Trong thời điểm đó, các cảnh sát nghi ngờ họ đã nhìn thấy những thứ có vẻ như là chất bất hợp pháp trong xe một cách rõ ràng. Đây là lý do đủ để họ có căn cứ chính đáng để tiến hành khám xét chiếc xe.
Các con trai của Slaton là Gage, 4 tuổi và Glenn, 2 tuổi – người mà cô ở chung với chồng cũ, Michael Halterman – có mặt trong xe của cô vào thời điểm cô bị bắt nhưng không bị thương, theo Crockett Cảnh sát trưởng Quận, người cũng đã nói với Chúng tôi rằng Bộ Dịch vụ Gia đình và Trẻ em đã tham gia vào vụ việc.
PIO nói với Chúng tôi: “Một kế hoạch đã được đưa ra với sự tham gia của các bậc cha mẹ và vẫn đang tiến hành một cuộc điều tra”. Gage và Glenn được thả cho một thành viên trong gia đình giam giữ sau vụ bắt giữ Slaton và Lovvorn.
Amy trở nên nổi tiếng cùng với chị gái mình, Tammy Slaton, trong chương trình “1000-Lb. Sisters” của TLC, ra mắt vào năm 2020. Loạt phim này kể về những thăng trầm trong hành trình giảm cân của từng cá nhân họ, cũng như cách nó ảnh hưởng đến sức khỏe và cá nhân của họ. những trải nghiệm.
Cuộc hành trình lãng mạn của Amy với Halterman cũng đã được miêu tả trên truyền hình. Họ kết hôn vào năm 2019 và trở thành cha mẹ của hai đứa con, một đứa sinh năm 2020 và một đứa khác sinh năm 2022.
Khoảng một năm sau khi sinh đứa con thứ hai, Halterman đệ đơn ly hôn với Amy sau gần 4 năm chung sống. Theo tài liệu tòa án mà chúng tôi có được, Halterman nêu rõ ngày ly thân của họ là ngày 24 tháng 2 năm 2023 và yêu cầu tòa án ban hành lệnh cấm để đảm bảo cả hai bên duy trì khoảng cách 500 feet với nơi ở của nhau.
Đơn xin lệnh cấm của Halterman còn bao gồm một điều khoản cấm cả anh và Amy đăng bất kỳ bình luận hoặc bài đăng trực tuyến nào về vụ kiện này hoặc về nhau. Ngoài ra, Halterman còn đề xuất một kế hoạch nuôi dạy con chung để họ tuân theo.
Vào tháng 9 năm 2023, người ta nói rằng cuộc ly hôn của họ đã chính thức được hoàn tất bởi vợ chồng cũ. Họ quyết định chia sẻ quyền nuôi con cho hai đứa con của mình.
Trở lại tháng 2 năm 2023 đầy gay cấn, không ai khác chính là Amy rạng rỡ đã tiết lộ cho chúng tôi, những người hâm mộ luôn háo hức của bạn, những chi tiết thân mật về cuộc sống của cô ấy với Halterman. Nhiều tháng trước khi anh nộp đơn ly hôn, cô đã thẳng thắn thú nhận rằng cô không khao khát có thêm con cái và khẳng định: “Gia đình tôi đã trọn vẹn rồi!” Nói theo cách riêng của cô ấy, “Là một người mẹ không mệt mỏi, tôi dành sức lực của mình cho chúng khi chúng ngủ. Đó là lúc tôi tắm rửa xứng đáng hoặc giải quyết các vấn đề cá nhân.”
- Grayscale Bitcoin ETF cuối cùng cũng nhìn thấy dòng vốn vào: Liệu bây giờ BTC có vượt qua 70 nghìn đô la không?
- Đặt cược Bitcoin của Metaplanet tăng cổ phiếu lên 10%
- Haruko khai thác các ngăn xếp để mang dịch vụ tiền điện tử đến các nhà đầu tư tổ chức
- Ngân hàng Commonwealth bổ sung ETF BTC đơn sắc vào các dịch vụ đầu tư
- Tác phẩm nghệ thuật mới nhất của Beeple có Andrew Tate và Iggy Azalea
- Dự đoán giá Dogecoin – Hãy chú ý đến những mục tiêu ngắn hạn này!
- Ripple đạt được bước đột phá lớn: SEC giảm nhu cầu thanh toán xuống còn 103 triệu USD
- 4,3 triệu đô la tiền điện tử bị đánh cắp từ vụ hack Remilia DAO được truy tìm đến Tornado Cash
- Chiến thắng lớn cho ETH; SEC kết thúc cuộc điều tra về ETH 2.0
- Hacker mũ trắng từ chối trả lại 3 triệu USD bị đánh cắp từ kho bạc Kraken
2024-09-03 21:59