1000-Lb. Ngôi sao của Sisters Amy Slaton đã bị bắt tại sở thú Tennessee vào cuối tuần nghỉ lễ.
Có vẻ như bạn đang mô tả chiến lược của Sở cảnh sát quận Crockett để đối phó với một vị khách bị lạc đà cắn tại một vườn thú địa phương và khi đến nơi, họ ngay lập tức bị choáng ngợp bởi mùi hôi đáng ngờ bốc ra từ xe của vị khách đó.
Dòng này là một cách chơi chữ thông minh dùng để chỉ bài đăng, Slaton và chiếc xe. Đường dây đã bị bắt vì sở hữu Bảng I, Bảng VI và hai tội danh gây nguy hiểm cho trẻ em. Một người đàn ông tên Brian Scott có mặt trong phòng xử án, đã bị bắt với tội danh tương tự như cảnh sát đã nêu.
This statement is commonly used in legal settings to emphasize the presumption of innocence, which is a crucial aspect of the case. The statement suggests that the charges and allegations are merely accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence, and implies that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty through due process of law. This language is often used in legal contexts to highlight the importance of the presumption of innocence, which is a fundamental aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the significance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are referred to as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which is an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is usually employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as a crucial aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently employed in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The presumption of innocence refers to the role as an essential element in a legal proceedings where the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. The presumption of innocence serves as an essential element in the case by, which plays an essential part in the role of:
Chúng tôi đã xác nhận vào thứ Ba, ngày 3 tháng 9, rằng Slaton và Lovvorn vẫn đang bị giam giữ và đang chờ phiên điều trần tại ngoại sau khi bị phát hiện mang theo thứ mà cảnh sát cho là nấm và cần sa mà họ sở hữu. Theo Cán bộ Thông tin Công cộng Stephen Sutton, một nhân viên vườn thú đã gọi 911 để báo cáo rằng Slaton đã bị lạc đà cắn và do bị cho là bị thương nên đã được đưa đến phòng cấp cứu và sau đó bị bắt sau khi cô được chăm sóc y tế.
Trong thời điểm đó, các cảnh sát nghi ngờ họ đã nhìn thấy những thứ có vẻ như là chất bất hợp pháp trong xe một cách rõ ràng. Đây là lý do đủ để họ có căn cứ chính đáng để tiến hành khám xét chiếc xe.
Các con trai của Slaton là Gage, 4 tuổi và Glenn, 2 tuổi – người mà cô ở chung với chồng cũ, Michael Halterman – có mặt trong xe của cô vào thời điểm cô bị bắt nhưng không bị thương, theo Crockett Cảnh sát trưởng Quận, người cũng đã nói với Chúng tôi rằng Bộ Dịch vụ Gia đình và Trẻ em đã tham gia vào vụ việc.
PIO nói với Chúng tôi: “Một kế hoạch đã được đưa ra với sự tham gia của các bậc cha mẹ và vẫn đang tiến hành một cuộc điều tra”. Gage và Glenn được thả cho một thành viên trong gia đình giam giữ sau vụ bắt giữ Slaton và Lovvorn.
Amy trở nên nổi tiếng cùng với chị gái mình, Tammy Slaton, trong chương trình “1000-Lb. Sisters” của TLC, ra mắt vào năm 2020. Loạt phim này kể về những thăng trầm trong hành trình giảm cân của từng cá nhân họ, cũng như cách nó ảnh hưởng đến sức khỏe và cá nhân của họ. những trải nghiệm.
Cuộc hành trình lãng mạn của Amy với Halterman cũng đã được miêu tả trên truyền hình. Họ kết hôn vào năm 2019 và trở thành cha mẹ của hai đứa con, một đứa sinh năm 2020 và một đứa khác sinh năm 2022.
Khoảng một năm sau khi sinh đứa con thứ hai, Halterman đệ đơn ly hôn với Amy sau gần 4 năm chung sống. Theo tài liệu tòa án mà chúng tôi có được, Halterman nêu rõ ngày ly thân của họ là ngày 24 tháng 2 năm 2023 và yêu cầu tòa án ban hành lệnh cấm để đảm bảo cả hai bên duy trì khoảng cách 500 feet với nơi ở của nhau.
Đơn xin lệnh cấm của Halterman còn bao gồm một điều khoản cấm cả anh và Amy đăng bất kỳ bình luận hoặc bài đăng trực tuyến nào về vụ kiện này hoặc về nhau. Ngoài ra, Halterman còn đề xuất một kế hoạch nuôi dạy con chung để họ tuân theo.
Vào tháng 9 năm 2023, người ta nói rằng cuộc ly hôn của họ đã chính thức được hoàn tất bởi vợ chồng cũ. Họ quyết định chia sẻ quyền nuôi con cho hai đứa con của mình.
Trở lại tháng 2 năm 2023 đầy gay cấn, không ai khác chính là Amy rạng rỡ đã tiết lộ cho chúng tôi, những người hâm mộ luôn háo hức của bạn, những chi tiết thân mật về cuộc sống của cô ấy với Halterman. Nhiều tháng trước khi anh nộp đơn ly hôn, cô đã thẳng thắn thú nhận rằng cô không khao khát có thêm con cái và khẳng định: “Gia đình tôi đã trọn vẹn rồi!” Nói theo cách riêng của cô ấy, “Là một người mẹ không mệt mỏi, tôi dành sức lực của mình cho chúng khi chúng ngủ. Đó là lúc tôi tắm rửa xứng đáng hoặc giải quyết các vấn đề cá nhân.”
- Aubrey Plaza nói rằng cô ấy ‘Quên cách nói chuyện’ sau khi bị đột quỵ ở tuổi 20
- Core Scientific Signs 3,5 tỷ USD, hợp đồng 12 năm với công ty AI CoreWeave
- Các nhà bán lẻ Hàn Quốc bắt đầu thu hẹp quy mô hoạt động NFT
- Imane Khelif giành huy chương vàng quyền anh Olympic, chiến thắng các trận đấu cả trong và ngoài võ đài
- Phần ngoại truyện của ‘Young Sheldon’ ‘Cuộc hôn nhân đầu tiên của Georgia & Mandy’: Những điều cần biết
- Đây là số dư Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin hiện tại của Binance
- AAVE đã sẵn sàng cho sự đột phá tiềm năng, nhà phân tích dự đoán mục tiêu 180-200 USD
- Mạng 1kx rút 2,37 triệu đô la bằng $RPL sau mức tăng 22%
- AVAX có thể tăng lên 29 USD sau đợt tăng giá gần đây không?
- Tại sao các công ty khai thác Bitcoin có thể kéo giá BTC xuống còn 54 nghìn đô la một lần nữa
2024-09-03 21:59